Food Premises Inspection Reports

Discuss healthy foods here
Forum rules
User avatar
Riskynet
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 22889
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:54 am
Gender: None specified
Age: 57

Food Premises Inspection Reports

Post #1 by Riskynet » Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:11 pm

[center][size=134][b]Food Premises Inspection Reports[/b]



[/size]
[b][size=134]Critical Infractions — 2014

[/size]
[/b]
[/center]

[center][b][size=100]January 9, 2014[/size][/b][/center]

[center]Timmins McDonald's Restaurant 520 Algonquin Blvd East[/center]

[center]Cooking/hot holding/reheating of hazardous food[/center]

[center][b][size=100]January 10, 2014[/size][/b][/center]

[center]Timmins The McIntyre Coffee Shop 85 McIntyre Road[/center]

[center]Refrigerated and frozen storage of hazardous food[/center]

User avatar
DenBen
VIP
VIP
Posts: 13191
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:57 pm
Gender: Male
Age: 44

Post #2 by DenBen » Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:30 pm

McDonald's?!?! That's a first.

User avatar
Budgetman
Admin
Admin
Posts: 27534
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:00 am
Gender: Male
Age: 46

Post #3 by Budgetman » Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:48 pm

is this the only type of infractions the Porcupine Health department knows how to lay?
[watch
Image I say my opinion if its good bad or other, Just like you I have the right to voice it.
if you get paid minimum wage, it's like your boss saying i'd pay you less but its illegal
John Stalks me!!!!! [panic

User avatar
DenBen
VIP
VIP
Posts: 13191
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:57 pm
Gender: Male
Age: 44

Post #4 by DenBen » Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:54 pm

Infractions are not the same as charges. These categories are so vague. It could be something like a loose faucet for a hand washing station to a a one degree drop in a holding place for hamburger patties Like McDs does, or the inspector arrived 5 minutes after the freezer was open for a 30 minutes for a full shipment of frozen goods that arrived.



Charges are a serious thing. I've seen them listed but don't happen often.

User avatar
Budgetman
Admin
Admin
Posts: 27534
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:00 am
Gender: Male
Age: 46

Post #5 by Budgetman » Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:58 pm

so vague it is scary, lol. as i always say id rather know about the charges and shut downs over this stupidity, these infractions are just PR for the PHU to say hey we are working for your health.
[watch
Image I say my opinion if its good bad or other, Just like you I have the right to voice it.
if you get paid minimum wage, it's like your boss saying i'd pay you less but its illegal
John Stalks me!!!!! [panic

User avatar
Riskynet
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 22889
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:54 am
Gender: None specified
Age: 57

Post #6 by Riskynet » Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:59 pm

Less inspections, Why ? Not enough inspectors? Last one was in September of last year. Who's auditing our local restaurants ? [think Not good.

User avatar
DenBen
VIP
VIP
Posts: 13191
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:57 pm
Gender: Male
Age: 44

Post #7 by DenBen » Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:02 pm

It was probably happening but not posted online.

User avatar
Budgetman
Admin
Admin
Posts: 27534
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:00 am
Gender: Male
Age: 46

Post #8 by Budgetman » Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:04 pm

most of the audits are stupid esp. these vague infractions they keep posting without a explanation of the reason they were laid. you can't even google a valid reason for the terms they use. in my eyes that means its just a local violation/code that isn't in use anywhere else.
[watch
Image I say my opinion if its good bad or other, Just like you I have the right to voice it.
if you get paid minimum wage, it's like your boss saying i'd pay you less but its illegal
John Stalks me!!!!! [panic

User avatar
Riskynet
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 22889
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:54 am
Gender: None specified
Age: 57

Post #9 by Riskynet » Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:14 pm

[b][size=100]Sudbury convictions[/size][/b]



[url]http://inspectionresults.sdhu.com/#convictions[/url]





[b][size=100]Sudbury closures[/size][/b]



[url]http://inspectionresults.sdhu.com/#closures[/url]









[b][size=100]Sudbury Common Terms[/size][/b]





[b][size=100]Food Premises[/size][/b] A premises where food or milk is manufactured, processed, prepared, stored, handled, displayed, distributed, transported, sold or offered for sale, but does not include a private residence.





[b][size=100]Compliance Inspection[/size][/b] Public health inspectors have the duty and the authority under the [url=http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h07_e.htm][color=#0066cc]Health Protection and Promotion Act[/color][/url] to inspect food premises within their jurisdiction to ensure compliance with the [url=http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900562_e.htm][color=#0066cc]Food Premises Regulation (R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 562)[/color][/url].

The [url=http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/pubhealth/oph_standards/ophs/index.html][color=#0066cc]Ontario Public Health Standards[/color][/url] require that all food premises be inspected in accordance with the following schedule:



Not less than once every 4 months for high-risk premises;



Not less than once every 6 months for moderate-risk premises; and



Not less than once every 12 months for low-risk premises.





[b][size=100]Risk Catagories[/size][/b] Food premises are assigned to a risk category based on an annual site-specific risk assessment. Several factors determine the risk category into which an establishment is placed. Factors include characteristics of the population served, the type of food prepared at the establishment and the food handling practices and food safety knowledge of the food handlers.





[b][size=100]Re-inspection[/size][/b]

During the course of a compliance inspection, if a public health inspector identifies infractions under the [url=http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900562_e.htm][color=#0066cc]Food Premises Regulation[/color][/url], a re-inspection is conducted in order to ensure that appropriate corrective action is taken by the food premises owner/operator.





[b][size=100]Actions Taken[/size][/b]

Satisfactory - No Action Required:

The food premises was operating in accordance with the [url=http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900562_e.htm][color=#0066cc]Food Premises Regulation[/color][/url] at the time of the inspection.

[size=100][b]Corrected During Inspection:[/b][/size] The public health inspector observed an infraction under the [url=http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900562_e.htm][color=#0066cc]Food Premises Regulation[/color][/url] during the course of the inspection; however, the owner or operator corrected the infraction prior to the end of the inspection.

[b][size=100]Re-inspection Scheduled:[/size][/b] The public health inspector observed one or more infractions under the [url=http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900562_e.htm][color=#0066cc]Food Premises Regulation[/color][/url] and scheduled a re-inspection in order to ensure that the infraction was corrected.

[b][size=100]Charge:[/size][/b] A charge (also known as a certificate of offence or ticket) can be issued by a public health inspector when contraventions to the [url=http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900562_e.htm][color=#0066cc]Food Premises Regulation [/color][/url]are observed during an inspection.

[b][size=100]Closure:[/size][/b] Under the [url=http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h07_e.htm][color=#0066cc]Health Protection and Promotion Act,[/color][/url] a medical officer of health or a public health inspector can order a food premises to close due to an imminent health risk for which the only means of preventing human illness is by ordering the premises to close until the health hazard is eliminated.

User avatar
DenBen
VIP
VIP
Posts: 13191
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:57 pm
Gender: Male
Age: 44

Post #10 by DenBen » Thu Jan 16, 2014 12:46 am

[notes

User avatar
Loco101
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 15202
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:26 am
Gender: None specified
Age: 42

Post #11 by Loco101 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:14 am

I remember when Lucky Star had a charge. I think there was somewhere else in Timmins but can't remember.

User avatar
Riskynet
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 22889
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:54 am
Gender: None specified
Age: 57

Post #12 by Riskynet » Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:58 pm

[b]January 27, 2014 Timmins [/b]

[b]The Broadway Diner 71 Third Avenue [/b]

[b]Refrigerated and frozen storage of hazardous food [/b]







[b]January 27, 2014 Timmins [/b]

[b]The Broadway Diner 71 Third Avenue [/b]

[b]Protection from food handler contamination[/b]

BBailz
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:31 am
Gender: None specified
Age: 28

Post #13 by BBailz » Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:37 am

[quote="Loco101"]I remember when Lucky Star had a charge. I think there was somewhere else in Timmins but can't remember.[/quote]

I feel like Chez Nous must have had one at some point?

User avatar
Riskynet
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 22889
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:54 am
Gender: None specified
Age: 57

Post #14 by Riskynet » Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:02 am

[quote="BBailz"]I feel like Chez Nous must have had one at some point?[/quote]

The health unit would need to check them out after 10 pm and you know that will never happen.

User avatar
Loco101
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 15202
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:26 am
Gender: None specified
Age: 42

Post #15 by Loco101 » Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:18 pm

[quote="Riskynet"]The health unit would need to check them out after 10 pm and you know that will never happen.[/quote]
Totally agree with that!!!



I bet they work evenings at times but I wonder how late.


Social Media

     

Return to “Food and Your Health”